Look HERE.
Then, thinking through what you need to do, remember to: 1) locate places to add research; 2) revise according to the peer review feedback and class discussion we had today.
When thinking about 'what the dialogue needs' in terms of ideas, consider four solid ideas with a couple (two) supporting claims (these claims will be tied to research), or maybe three solid ideas with several (three or more) supporting claims. It's a 'breadth' v 'depth' consideration, at least in part. If you want to do something else, go ahead and trust your intuition, as long as you're envisioning a richly argued, well documented dialogue.
Remember, imagine that 25-33% of your sources are academic (peer reviewed) sources, not just easily searchable web sources. Remember, too, that Wikipedia is 'general knowledge' - it's not considered a 'real source' so much as a location for public information. I wouldn't cite it more than once, if you do so at all. I would, however, consult it as much as necessary, as it can sometimes be helpful.
No comments:
Post a Comment